Movie Review: Defiance (2008)


I’m not entirely sure why there is a run on “based on a true story” World War II movies as of late, but the newest of the bunch is Defiance. This one doesn’t delve into an assassination plot to kill Hitler (see Valkyrie for that), nor does it tell the tale of an all black infantry unit stranded in Italy (Miracle at St. Anna for that). Instead, this tells the prolonged tale of the triumph of the soul of 1000+ Polish Jews and their fight to survive in the Belarussian Forest away from the cruel hands of the Nazis.

Leading this harried bunch to safety is the Beilskis brothers — Tuvia (Daniel Craig), Zus (Live Schreiber), and to a lesser extent, Asael (Jamie Bell). Tuvia is determined to maintain some semblance of normalcy under the dire conditions while Zus believes the only way to survive is to take the Nazis and their sympathizers to task. It is these diverged paths and the corresponding mindsets of all involved that director Edward Zwick focuses his attention upon with varying levels of success.

The bulk of the spotlight is afforded to Tuvia, as he is the most conflicted of the lot. Craig does an impressive job hanging up his James Bond duds to tackle the role of the reluctant leader. On one hand he’s a man who wants and seeks revenge for the murder of his family and on the other he insists on not sinking to the level of his people’s enemies. It is a fine line that, in a similar situation, I doubt I would have been able to walk. But he does it, going so far as to shoot dead a man who dared to challenge his insistence that the ragtag community maintain order and civility.

180-degress from Tuvia is bigger brother Zus. Casting Schreiber as this big, angry Jewish guy with a conscious probably couldn’t have been done any better. Angered that his brother is taking on more and more refugees at their makeshift camp (they could barely feed themselves), he leaves in disgust to fight with a band of Russian fighters hiding in the same forest. They give him satisfaction for the Nazi blood he craves but he soon realizes he’s in bed with bigots nearly as bad as the Germans. This leads to a cathartic moment that appears to be made just for the movies — I couldn’t believe it actually transpired as told.

Actually I questioned whether much of what I saw in Defiance played out in quite the same way in real life as in the way Zwick tells it. The film, based off of the book Defiance: The Bielski Partisans by Nechama Tec, surely takes a great many creative liberties. There is a Moses like moment that elevates Asael to messiah-like status. Bullets and bombs seem to miss anyone with any importance to the plot, just like a G.I. Joe cartoon (okay, someone does get shot in the arm, but c’mon — it’s the arm, not a vital organ!).

But at least there was a fair amount of raw action — something rather unexpected for a film about Holocaust survivors. It’s needed too because if it wasn’t interspersed now and again throughout the film, I fear the movie would have been reduced to nothing more than one about a community of people living in the woods. The fighting was a stark reminder as to the seriousness of what was going on at the time.

Defiance also that takes a hard look at and questions whether “an eye for an eye” or “turning the other cheek” is the proper way to respond to humiliation, degradation and murder. Ultimately, you can draw your own conclusions but I believe the Beilskis’ have shown that both beliefs, used in conjunction with one another (i.e., use force only when absolutely necessary), is probably the best course of action. It is a lesson some could stand to learn this day.

Critical Movie Critic Rating:
3 Star Rating: Average

3

Movie Review: Yes Man (2008)
Movie Review: The Spirit (2008)

The Critical Movie Critics

I'm an old, miserable fart set in his ways. Some of the things that bring a smile to my face are (in no particular order): Teenage back acne, the rain on my face, long walks on the beach and redneck women named Francis. Oh yeah, I like to watch and criticize movies.


'Movie Review: Defiance (2008)' have 10 comments

  1. The Critical Movie Critics

    January 24, 2009 @ 11:48 am Anne

    I saw the movie the last weekend and was not that bad. Nothing special but at least was entertaining or maybe I just like the WW2 movies.

  2. The Critical Movie Critics

    January 29, 2009 @ 8:58 am james

    Great to see daniel trying new charactors in different movie, not a bad movie, i give it 7/10

  3. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 15, 2009 @ 3:03 pm analyst

    Another Hollywood tale which doesn’t have anything to do with the real history of WWII. Bad example of Western Russophobia. Russians in this movie are portrayed as drunks, Nazis collaborators, and Jews haters. I hope that those few WWII survivals in the former USSR will never see this movie, as the movie is nothing but an insult to the real heroes of that war. I cannot believe that good actors agreed to be a part of this horrific move.

  4. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 17, 2009 @ 12:50 pm GeezLouise

    HOLLYWOOD ELITES self-righteouslessly rail against War and Violence. Then they foist a movie on the great unwashed out here that uses a storyline with often unintelligible,contrived dialogue, seemingly as an excuse for an “action-shoot-em-up” Movie. I closed my eyes for a good part of the picture, listening to the intermittent “dialogue”, but mainly heard the rat-ta-tat-tatting of the guns, Nazi guns, Russian guns, Jewish guns. Save you $$$ and your time.

  5. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 6, 2009 @ 1:43 am paul packer

    A poor film. Had the feel throughout of a very predictable telemovie, even to the unconvincing violence (bullets seem to hit everything but bodies). Poor, occasionally unintellible dialogue, and washed-out, irritating, wiggle-the-camera-around-to-simulate-excitement cinematography. I never got involved with any of the characters. I never had the feeling that anything original or unexpected was going to happen. Perhas most indicative of the utter predictability of the whole film was the scene where James..er, Daniel Craig shoots a fellow refugee for questioning his authority. This is telegraphed well before by the fact that Craig turns slowly away from his victim before suddenly turning back to shoot him, just as John Wayne did in a hundred movies before punching someone. And oh, that Private Ryan device of the hero being defeaned by concussion and hearing only a whistle…put that to bed, please. It was used twice in Ryan and that’s enough, thanks, especially as I already have tinnitus and don’t need any movie demonstrations of it. Anyway, a very disappointing, by-the-numbers movie about an important subject, which, if it wasn’t originally intended as a telemovie, should have been consigned to freeview anyway.

  6. The Critical Movie Critics

    November 1, 2009 @ 9:54 pm sms kostenlos

    I saw the movie today. Very nice.

  7. The Critical Movie Critics

    November 1, 2009 @ 10:56 pm paul packer

    Kostenlos, you shouldn’t be so voluble. Couldn’t you have given your opinion in just six words? Oh wait, you did…. :)

  8. The Critical Movie Critics

    November 24, 2009 @ 7:05 pm Dental Plan

    I thought that this movie was pretty good and moving. Craig and Schrieber had great chemistry as brothers.

  9. The Critical Movie Critics

    January 12, 2010 @ 1:45 pm drew levin

    This was an amazing movie with great cinematography.

  10. The Critical Movie Critics

    September 26, 2010 @ 9:05 am tera hapatti

    Another Hollywood tale which doesn’t have anything to do with the real history of WWII. Bad example of Western Russophobia. Russians in this movie are portrayed as drunks, Nazis collaborators, and Jews haters. I hope that those few WWII survivals in the former USSR will never see this movie, asthe movie is nothing but an insult to the real heroes of that war. I cannot believe that good actors agreed to be a part of this horrific move.

Privacy Policy | About Us

 | Log in

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger