Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) by The Critical Movie Critics

Movie Review: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)

Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) by The Critical Movie Critics

Defiant apes.

Before I begin, there is something I need to get off my chest. Rise of the Planet of the Apes? I can understand the producers’ desire to link this film with the rest of the series, but I’m sure audiences would’ve made the same connection if it was just called Rise of the Apes (or something similar). But fear not, because an overly clunky, lame title is by far the worst aspect of this movie. It falls short of replicating the thematic genius of the original, yet wipes the floor with Tim Burton’s ridiculous remake, “Planet of the Apes.”

In this prequel, Will Rodman (James Franco) is a medical scientist tasked with creating a cure for Alzheimer’s disease, a formula that to date has only been tested on apes. Its success is determined by measuring a primate’s increased intelligence, but after one subject flips out and is killed, Will takes in her baby and raises the chimp as a son. Noticing that his mother has passed the effects of the drug genetically to young Caesar, Will is shocked to see just how extensive the side effects are, resulting in Caesar developing a mind far beyond any ape, as well as typically human traits such as empathy and compassion, leading to a bond between the chimp and Will’s Alzheimer’s-afflicted father Charles (John Lithgow).

Although personally considered one of the best up-and-coming actors in the business, Franco doesn’t have to extend his acting chops here, nor does on-screen girlfriend Frieda Pinto. The criminally underused Lithgow does well in a small role, but it is Andy Serkis, as the man behind the computer-generated Caesar, who steals the show. I suppose this was to be expected (he did Gollum in the The Lord of the Rings trilogy, after all) but I was constantly amazed at how brilliantly a human could not only mimic the movement of an animal, but also invoke real audience empathy for what is just an animated image.

The short runtime of the film (approximately 105 minutes) is accommodated by excellent pacing. Certainly, Rise of the Planet of the Apes is aware of its status as a blockbuster, so almost by definition the movie must move quickly, but this is juxtaposed by the slow, progressive development of Caesar, inserting realism into an area I was expecting would just be glossed over by director Rupert Wyatt. Caesar starts out learning basic life skills, but as he ages, his genetic mutation teaches him complex talents such as intimidation, manipulation, violence and dominance. By the end of the film, he has become the leader of a downtrodden civilization, spreading his anti-human propaganda for the sake of fulfilling an ambitious plan.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) by The Critical Movie Critics

Interspecies friendship.

Saying that isn’t a spoiler — here we have a film in which the ending is inherently obvious even before the opening credits roll. The joy comes from exactly how it arrives to that conclusion. I was expecting a big, dumb, battle-for-survival movie going in, but Rise of the Planet of the Apes remains grounded in the sheer art of storytelling for the most part, saving the final battle for a very enjoyable climactic set piece. As one friend stated, you almost become a fan of the apes by the third act, if only to see just how they go about their hostile takeover. In fact, even the final scene does not try to be too excessive, striking a perfect balance between belief suspension and reality.

But to those who may not buy into the premise entirely, I assure you that the vast majority of the plot is explained logically, and any sudden escalation of the story is accounted for with reason for a character’s actions or development. As mentioned earlier, Caesar does not immediately become a walking, talking, weapon-wielding ape but instead grows slowly. This is beneficial in justifying the extremities and complexities in his character that have become apparent by film’s end.

The movie works in certain scenes that hint to the original — both in terms of imagery and the shift in power from apes to humans — but it does not quite match the thought-provoking nature of the 1968 sci-fi master “Planet of the Apes.” Instead, Rise of the Planet of the Apes adds a cautionary, self-conscious element to the story (something certainly welcomed by this movie fan) which results in a final product I do not hesitate to recommend.

Critical Movie Critic Rating:
4 Star Rating: Good


Movie Review: 5 Days of War (2011)
Movie Review: Julie & Julia (2009)

The Critical Movie Critics

A few years ago, a good friend of mine started calling me 'Hollywood' because of my love and knowledge of all things movies, and the name just stuck. Movies are my life. I love them so much that when people ask me why I even bother with law school, I reply with my life motto, and a quote from one of my favourite directors: 'I didn't go to film school. I went to films.' -Quentin Tarantino.

'Movie Review: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)' have 10 comments

  1. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 5, 2011 @ 11:07 pm marc

    Heard all good things about this one. Can’t wait to see it tomorrow!

  2. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 6, 2011 @ 7:06 am Victreebel

    The obvious is the fantastic visual effects by WETA. Not so obvious is the Caesar arc is very emotionally touching. Rise of the Planet of the Apes is definitely one worth the hype afforded to it. Well done.

  3. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 6, 2011 @ 3:16 pm Tattoo Dynomite

    Andy Serkis deserved an Oscar for his work as Gollum in The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers/The Return of the King. Maybe the Academy will make up for their miss by honoring him for the work he does with Caesar in this movie.

  4. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 6, 2011 @ 7:22 pm JohnnyHollywood

    I must say I agree with every comment here. The emotional element added to Caesar and his role in the film is what really pushes it from just some run-of-the-mill blockbuster to a genuinely engaging story.

    As for Serkis, if he doesn’t win a technical Academy Award for this, then I’m certain this is the film that will earn him an honorary Oscar sometime in the future, not unlike John Chambers’ award for make-up on the original Planet of the Apes.

  5. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 8, 2011 @ 1:58 am Speeney

    good but not great.

  6. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 9, 2011 @ 6:10 pm Snoopy_bae

    The person Who Wrote the Review NEeds To ShUt Up The Movie IS Awsome I wanna Watch It Over And Over Again I Felt Sad For Ceasar The Monkey Cause He Was Abused

  7. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 10, 2011 @ 9:40 pm quazign

    i think the tie in the with originals was absolutely great, the whole “mars mission” thing hinting about the 1968 space travel related plot element, how the heredity of the virus hints how a society could feasibly evolve through many generations, and of course after the credits roll (STICK AROUND!) how the advanced virus strain is hinted as the cause of some “set to occur” pandemic, completely justifying the series’ setting in the future.

  8. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 11, 2011 @ 2:20 am herry smarto

    i have watched a lot of promotion for this movie and the same that was i have watched it the night before it was a great movie!!

  9. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 11, 2011 @ 6:54 am JohnnyHollywood

    Absolutely. For me, a key determinant of the success of this film would be how well it justified its position in the context of all the other ‘Apes’ films. Obviously, it did that quite well, resulting in not only a respectable score, but a lot of interest in upcoming sequels.

  10. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 14, 2011 @ 5:25 am Rizzo

    I don’t know what all the fuss was about this movie. The apes/chimps looked lifelike most of the time but the story was severely lacking.

Privacy Policy | About Us

 | Log in

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger