Movie Review: When in Rome (2010)

Within the first ten minutes of my viewing of When in Rome, I knew the next 81 minutes of my life were going to be painful and feel like an eternity. Repeatedly, I had to remind myself that there had to be a comedic or romantic moment hidden away somewhere in the bowels of the film that would make it all worth it. After all, Kristen Bell is cute, but the brain trust behind this movie couldn’t possibly have thought her cuteness was enough to be the only attraction. Could they?

They could. But if you’re a betting man, I suppose one out of two ain’t bad! Bell it turns out is pretty much the only palatable part of the movie (even though the role she plays is reduced to something slightly more than an idiot). There is but one funny moment in this romantic comedy; two perhaps, if you stretch the meaning of funny to its very limits.

While is it would be easy to tear the film down on its absurd premise alone, I won’t since writers David Diamond and David Weissman obviously meant for it to be a whimsical fantasy roller coaster ride. A speeding roller coaster, mind you, in which annoying people are taking a ride.

Those annoying people meant to entertain come in the form of a street magician Lance (Jon Heder), a painter Antonio (Will Arnett), a wanna-be model Gale (Dax Shepard), and a sausage entrepreneur Al (Danny DeVito). They all find themselves smitten with Beth Harper (Bell) and are willing to do outrageous acts for her attention. I can’t necessarily fault them since their actions aren’t theirs — they’re all affected by an enchantment by the Goddess of Love, Venus. Upon scooping their wish coins from a fountain of love, Beth unwittingly caused these hapless suitors to chase her for her affections. Poor Beth, however, really wants Nick (Josh Duhamel) the best man at her sister Joan’s (Alexis Dziena) wedding.

As you can probably guess by now, When in Rome is just a string of dumb sequences preceding another scene of as dumb, if not dumber content. And everything is purposefully a setup for the next act too, laid out so obviously that it questions the intelligence of the viewer. The lone funny scene comes when Nick and Beth go to dinner at Blackout — a restaurant that has its patrons eating in the pitch dark. Ingeniously, the servers wear night vision goggles and, standing inches away from the unsuspecting diners, eavesdrop on conversations. Kristen Schaal is a scene stealer here and almost singlehandedly makes up for this childish mess of a movie. Keir O’Donnell, as gambling obsessed Father Dino, tries to spruce up the wedding with a silly accent and misspeaks but only with limited success.

The payoff for a romantic comedy, no matter how daft the setup is, is whether there is any believable chemistry between the leads. Again, When in Rome fails to deliver. Sure Bell and Duhamel are two good looking people but that’s where it all ends. It is a serious stretch to see these two come together at the end — especially after seeing how absurd each acts throughout in front of and to each other.

No doubt, it will take an act of God to manage to find a new twist on the used and abused rom-com genre. With the utmost of authority I can say When in Rome is no plague of locusts, although come to think of it, the outcome is nearly the same.

Critical Movie Critic Rating:
1 Star Rating: Stay Away


Movie Review: The Wolfman (2010)
Movie Review: The Black Dahlia (2006)

The Critical Movie Critics

I'm an old, miserable fart set in his ways. Some of the things that bring a smile to my face are (in no particular order): Teenage back acne, the rain on my face, long walks on the beach and redneck women named Francis. Oh yeah, I like to watch and criticize movies.

'Movie Review: When in Rome (2010)' have 6 comments

  1. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 14, 2010 @ 10:25 pm Roofey

    It took you 10 minutes to realize When in Rome was shit? Just knowing the cast of the movie was made up of 2 bit actors and has-beens should have been enough for you to know it sucked.

  2. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 15, 2010 @ 12:39 pm Katy

    I thought it was a cute movie, even though I predicted that one of the coins(poker chip) wasn’t Josh Duhamel’s. It was light-hearted and fun. I don’t think it was meant for any sort of acclaim.

  3. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 15, 2010 @ 2:09 pm General Disdain

    @ Roofey

    Just because the film was cast with, as you say “2 bit actors and has-beens”, doesn’t mean the movie was going to suck. It, of course, didn’t help the situation.

    @ Katy

    Everything about the movie was predictable. And stupid.

  4. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 17, 2010 @ 7:29 am Katy

    Maybe that’s just your “General Disdain” for a happy ending..just sayin’….

  5. The Critical Movie Critics

    February 17, 2010 @ 8:12 am General Disdain

    @ Katy

    Perhaps. Perhaps not. :)

  6. The Critical Movie Critics

    March 13, 2010 @ 1:07 am Rose Taylor

    I have not seen this movie ‘When in Rome’, that is why I wanted to read your review. I really want to watch this movie. I am interested in this movie as I think it might be an entertaining movie to watch with friends.

Privacy Policy | About Us

 | Log in

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger