Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) by The Critical Movie Critics

Movie Review: Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) by The Critical Movie Critics

The Enterprise has seen better days.

As the acting Captain of the U.S.S. Enterprise, Hikaru Sulu (John Cho, “A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas”) barked orders at an incorrigible outlaw of the Federation, John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch, “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy”), chills ran down my spine, and I sat in awe of the radiant visual effects. But that was no isolated incident; the entirety of Star Trek Into Darkness carries a lustrous aura with palpable, innovative cinematography. The Starfleet lay helpless as a belligerent new adversary made his presence known, but I too sat helpless as J.J. Abrams put forth the summer’s second renowned blockbuster (“Iron Man 3” getting first billing).

Star Trek Into Darkness, being Abrams’ sophomore effort (he successfully rebooted the franchise in 2009 with “Star Trek”), opens with the crew traveling to Nibiru, a planet with a primitive civilization and a volcano that is poised to wipe it off the map. Hiding beneath the sea, the Enterprise crew watches intently as Spock (Zachary Quinto, “Margin Call”) risks his life to extinguish the volcano’s spewing lava. When things go off plan, Captain Kirk (Chris Pine, “This Means War”), always one for not following the rules, breaks protocol to save his friend and First Officer. Although successful, for his brashness, Starfleet Command strips Kirk of his Captain rank and orders him to serve as First Officer to Admiral Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood, “Flight”).

This arrangement doesn’t last long as Starfleet Command headquarters is attacked by John Harrison (whose name is later revealed to be Khan), a genetically-superior man who’d been woken up after 300 years of cryogenic sleep to create weapons for the Federation. Khan it seems is very vengeful towards those who had roused his slumber because 72 of his crewmen still lay asleep and remain vulnerable to the actions of a stern, militaristic Starfleet Admiral, Alexander Marcus (Peter Weller, “RoboCop”).

Marcus, fully aware of what Khan is capable of, orders Kirk into pursuit. The crew — Spock, Bones (Karl Urban, “Dredd”), Sulu, Uhura (Zoe Saldana, “Colombiana”), Chekov (Anton Yelchin, “Fright Night”), Scotty (Simon Pegg, “Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol”), among others — encounters debris fields, technical malfunctions, betrayal and bona fide drama as they pursue their crafty adversary, but who will be double-crossed and fooled as tensions build? Will Starfleet once again save the day and allow the United Federation of Planets to continue living in harmony? Or will the lives of fan favorites crumble before viewers eyes as an even bigger foe is employed by Abrams?

These are sincere questions, because the acting by this ensemble sets a new benchmark for science fiction performances — one simply cannot not care these characters. Pine is daring, bold and accurately adventurous as Captain Kirk, and Zachary Quinto once again is brilliant as the robot-like, stiff yet genius Vulcan, Mr. Spock. In this sequel, Spock is also scripted as adamantly more emotional, a welcomed change for the Spock legacy. Another worthy performance, and perhaps not so expected, is the one put forth by Simon Pegg, who plays Lieutenant Commander Montgomery Scott. He is genuinely humorous (which we already knew) but he deftly handles the profoundly emotional drama, managing to single-handedly separate Star Trek Into Darkness from other recent charismatic Sci-Fi thrillers.

Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) by The Critical Movie Critics

Who is the prisoner?

Ignoring the visual effects of this blockbuster would also be a violation of the Prime Directive, because they are so good, you sometimes forget you’re not actually in the control center of the universe’s most formidable watchdog vessel. The cinematography too — from the expanses of space to the tight quarters of a starship — is just breathtaking (especially when the Enterprise is shown in the foreground of the Earth’s atmosphere). Keeping the optical feast from devolving into an amalgam of explosions and lasers (for the most part successful) is the noble script written by Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof, and the sumptuous direction of J.J. Abrams.

And even though the film runs longer than two hours, it soars by like the Enterprise’s shift into warp drive. And thanks in part to the illustrative, magical blue tendrils left behind as the vessel soars at the faster-than-light-speed, viewers likely won’t be put off from the messages of embracing diversity or the war mongering parallels of today’s world as they’re being told. Nope, viewers will simply be engrossed by the spectacle of what is happening before them. Star Trek Into Darkness is better than its predecessor; Trekkies and non-Trekkies alike will be most proud.

Critical Movie Critic Rating:
4 Star Rating: Good


Movie Review: Fast & Furious 6 (2013)
Movie Review: Kon-Tiki (2012)

Tagged: , ,

The Critical Movie Critics

Dan is an author, film critic and media professional. He is a former staff writer for the N.Y. Daily News, where he served as a film/TV reviewer with a "Top Critic" designation on Rotten Tomatoes. His debut historical fiction novel, "Synod," was published by an independent press in Jan. 2018, receiving praise among indie book reviewers. His research interests include English, military and political history.

'Movie Review: Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)' have 25 comments

  1. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 4:37 pm prompt

    Worthy sequel. I still prefer the first though.

  2. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 4:40 pm Joey Remix

    Great movie. The Spock-Kirk bromance was really well thought out. Benedict Cumberbatch made for a much better Khan than Ricardo Montalbán too.

  3. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 5:05 pm Ash

    IMAX here I come!

  4. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 5:17 pm SoWired

    A bit too much with the Scotty humor but overall a strong film.

  5. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 5:34 pm DJ Harmon

    It’s a good science fiction movie, and I was able to enjoy this as a non-Trekkie.

  6. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 5:58 pm Narcko

    Good review Dan.

  7. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 6:22 pm Betamax

    My only gripe is the Cumberbatch villain is underused. They certainly made him ruthless enough but fans shouldn’t have to wait until some further sequel to see him at his full potential.

    • The Critical Movie Critics

      May 19, 2013 @ 8:48 pm Cronol

      He’s underused because 1) audiences aren”t supposed to know he is Khan until the “big reveal” that isn’t much of a reveal and 2) villain duties are shared with the rogue admiral

  8. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 6:41 pm Piranhaconda

    Gotta love the attention the Alice Eve in bra & panties scene is getting in adverts. The scene has no bearing on the film but offers absolute proof that sex sells.

  9. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 7:09 pm Matt Genson

    Into Darkness puts a lot of emphasis on the relationship between Kirk and Spock that took years to develop in the original series. It’s crazy to say this but Pine and Quinto are better than Shatner and Nimoy in their respective roles. That’s an impressive feat after only two outings…

    • The Critical Movie Critics

      May 18, 2013 @ 11:30 pm localguy

      Realize Pine and Quinto have mountains of prior art to draw inspiration from. They’re good, not better.

  10. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 7:36 pm Reasonable Commander Haw

    I’ll just say I can’t wait to see what JJ Abrams does with Star Wars now. If he can do one tenth of what he’s done with the Star Trek universe we’re in for a treat!

  11. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 8:23 pm remmett

    It marks a good beginning to the big summer popcorn flicks.

    • The Critical Movie Critics

      May 19, 2013 @ 3:31 am Quonk

      that honor belongs to the billion dollar movie Iron Man 3..

  12. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 8:55 pm simon chet

    Awesome movie! Good to see Peter Weller getting dirty again too!

  13. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 10:04 pm timloftin

    It is missing the WOW factor the 2009 Trek hit me in the face with.

  14. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 18, 2013 @ 10:11 pm GhostLane

    J.J. Abrams has delivered.

    • The Critical Movie Critics

      May 19, 2013 @ 5:06 pm twinpeaks

      He delivered a stinker.

  15. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 19, 2013 @ 11:57 am Gene

    Loved it. Getting set for a second watch.

  16. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 19, 2013 @ 2:20 pm ManualManuel

    Good rental movie, nothing to get upset over if you miss its run in the theaters.

  17. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 19, 2013 @ 4:20 pm Engergizer

    Somewhere along the line the ideals that Star Trek embodied – that humans will overcome today’s problems, the future is hopeful, etc. – were lost in these remakes, especially Into Darkenss. Abrams, much to my disappointment, delivers just another future terrorist/seperatist movie that lacks any foward thinking or real heart.

  18. The Critical Movie Critics

    May 19, 2013 @ 9:21 pm eBjork

    I get it’s sci-fi but ID breaks every law of science, even laws established in the last movie!

    • The Critical Movie Critics

      May 20, 2013 @ 4:12 pm i

      lazy writing…….

      • The Critical Movie Critics

        May 24, 2013 @ 5:12 pm Halo

        This lack of detail really hurt the movie for me. A starship under water??

  19. The Critical Movie Critics

    June 1, 2013 @ 5:15 am Niejan

    Good review. I am really excited to watch this one.

Privacy Policy | About Us

 | Log in

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger