The Queen of Versailles (2012) by The Critical Movie Critics

Movie Review: The Queen of Versailles (2012)

The Queen of Versailles (2012) by The Critical Movie Critics

Posing unnecessarily.

Schadenfreude — pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others. The entire audience at the screening of The Queen of Versailles experienced this feeling about the Siegel family; they are truly atrocious people. Two years ago, David and Jackie Siegel were billionaires. They had planes, Rolls Royces, multiple nannies for their seven kids, hosted parties for the Miss America pageant (where David flirted with the contestants), and sat on a golden throne in their Orlando house during interviews for this documentary. They also began construction on a mansion called Versailles, a project which would become the largest house in the entire United States.

It appears the filmmakers wanted to document the rise of this monstrosity of a house and display the lifestyle of the obscenely rich. Even better, with rich people who liked to flaunt in front of the camera, not enjoy their splendor in private like Bill Gates. David Siegel proudly claims he is individually responsible for George W. Bush winning the state of Florida and therefore the presidency; however, he chuckles that what he did was not exactly legal. Oh yes, schadenfreude. David called himself the “King of Time Shares.” He built 28 resorts and an enormous building on the Vegas strip, parceled them up, and sold them 52 different times to vacationers. Then, in what must have exceeded all of the filmmakers’ expectations, the recession hit and everybody in the country stopped buying time shares.

And because nobody is buying time shares, there is no money coming in to the company, and David lays off 7,000 employees. He also fires 19 household servants. Dogs run around crapping all over the house and nobody picks it up. A fish floats at the top of its filthy tank and a lizard dies of lack of food and water leading one of the spoiled kids to exclaim, “I didn’t know we even had a lizard.” The Siegels were billionaires and yet, they had no savings. They put nothing away for college funds for their kids. In fact, Jackie stares at the camera exclaiming her children might actually have to go to college now. But don’t worry, Jackie still compulsively shops to add to the ridiculous piles of “stuff” that the kids do not even know they have. She also maintains her plastic surgery regimen. Jackie’s chest has enjoyed being a a third character in this whole mess.

The Queen of Versailles (2012) by The Critical Movie Critics

The filthy rich.

Other than the Michael Moore type of documentaries which have a stated agenda, filmmakers are thought to be neutral arbiters. They film the action, interview the subjects, and edit it in a way fair to all the players. However, no matter how one were to edit the footage of The Queen of Versailles, the Siegels were going to come off looking like some very horrible people. David is 30 years Jackie’s senior and now that their funds are rapidly dwindling away, he is starting to get tired of his third wife. He hides in his office (a couch in front of a flat screen surrounded by papers and food scraps) to enjoy being away from the chaos which his house has become.

And so in the end, one does not envy the Siegels. Although they still have more money than most humans on Earth, no one would ever switch places with them. I walked out of the theater with a new appreciation for my situation in life knowing that I’m not consumed with materialism — spending time with family and friends is what is most important. The fact that there are folks like the Siegels out there, who by the way are shocked a bank bailout did not filter down to them, makes you shake your head in shame at the human race.

Critical Movie Critic Rating:
4 Star Rating: Good


Movie Review: Total Recall (2012)
Movie Review: Savages (2012)

'Movie Review: The Queen of Versailles (2012)' have 10 comments

  1. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 4, 2012 @ 3:01 pm Greg

    Fuck these people and all they stand for.

  2. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 4, 2012 @ 3:56 pm Cerealist

    Karma is a bitch.

  3. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 4, 2012 @ 5:19 pm Jackie

    And these are the people lobbying for additional tax breaks!

    Obama 2012!

  4. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 4, 2012 @ 6:34 pm Lego Ninja

    Getting a glimpse at opulence gone wild turns my stomach. These people have no class or shame.

  5. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 4, 2012 @ 9:13 pm KJ Wonson

    It’s easy to hate on people like this. They come off as assholes (and probably don’t even realize it) but they are the “American Dream”.

  6. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 5, 2012 @ 2:28 pm dar

    ManyThanks for the graphic&insightful review,Prof CJ

  7. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 7, 2012 @ 2:57 pm Sunny

    History has shown true happiness cannot be bought. Materialism offer short term relief only. Glad you reaffirmed what is important to you Charlie, now if only more people could to come to this realization what a better world we would live in.

  8. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 9, 2012 @ 4:55 pm RobtheRich

    And the purpose of this movie is what? There is no lesson to be learned-it just gives people like this another forum to strut their stuff……..

  9. The Critical Movie Critics

    August 11, 2012 @ 9:30 am LeftExit

    Eat the rich!

  10. The Critical Movie Critics

    September 7, 2012 @ 6:21 pm metwo

    pompous m-fers.

Privacy Policy | About Us

 | Log in

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger